This site is no longer being maintained

Comparison and selection of fighters – this is how we selected the best multi-role fighter for Finland


Many factors affected the comparison and selection of the Hornets’ replacements. The most important criterion was the fighter’s capabilities. The assessment was carried out by the best experts in Finland. 

Options for replacing Hornets

In spring 2016, a request for information was sent to the United Kingdom, Sweden, France and the United States. This request produced information about the following fighter models:

  • Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet (United States)
  • Dassault Rafale (France)
  • Eurofighter Typhoon (UK)
  • Lockheed Martin F-35 (United States)
  • Saab Gripen (Sweden)


Comparison and selection of fighters – what criteria was used to make the selection?


The selection of fighters was a significant decision in terms of security policy, defence policy and national economy. Many factors affected this decision. The following were specified as areas of key importance for making the decision:

  • Capabilities. The system's capability to win fights during its service life.
  • Costs. Can we afford to purchase, use and develop the system throughout is life cycle?
  • Security of supply and the domestic industry’s role. The usability of the system in times of peace and war.
  • Security and defence policy impacts. Potential impacts of the selection on Finland’s security and defence cooperation.

While the most crucial area for making the decision on the fighter selection was capabilities, all other areas were also important. The comparison of fighters was carried out by the best experts in Finland. The defence administration made then a proposal on the type and number of fighters to be procured. The final decision was made by the Government on the 10 December 2021. The funding for the project was approved by Parliament. Read more about HX Fighter Programme timeline.



Good to know

Selecting a fighter takes foresight


A fighter is a high-technology weapons system. In order to serve Finland’s defence, it must be at least equal in quality to the enemy's weapons.

The service life of the new fighters is expected to extend till the 2060s. This is why we must select them with foresight. When selecting the new fighter, we need to be able to assess its development potential. Assessing the aircraft’s development potential is more important than looking at its current qualities.

All candidates have prepared a development programme. The scope of their contents, the specificity of the plans and the foreseeable prices of the development programmes vary, however.